| Organic
foods in relation to nutrition and health key facts
11 Jul 2004
This factsheet is
a summary of an article published in “Coronary and Diabetic
Care in the UK 2004” by the Association of Primary Care
Groups and Trusts (UK). It was written by James Cleeton, Policy
Projects Co-ordinator at the Soil Association.
The article concluded
that a predominantly organic diet:
• reduces the
amount of toxic chemicals ingested;
• totally avoids
GMOs [genetically modified organisms];
• reduces the
amount of food additives and colourings;
• increases
the amount of beneficial vitamins, minerals, EFAs [essential
fatty acids] and antioxidants consumed;
• appears to
have the potential to lower the incidence of common conditions
such as cancer, coronary heart disease, allergies and hyperactivity
in children.
1) PESTICIDES
The routine use of
synthetic pesticides is not allowed under organic standards.
Currently, over 400 chemicals can be regularly used in conventional
farming to kill weeds, insects and other pests that attack crops.
For example, Cox’s apples can be sprayed up to 16 times
with 36 different pesticides. 7 Only four chemicals are allowed
in restricted circumstances under Soil Association standards.
“Organic food
contains fewer residues of pesticides used in conventional agriculture,
so buying organic is one way to reduce the chances that your
food contains these pesticides” (Sir John Krebs, Chair,
Food Standards Agency, Cheltenham Science Festival debate, 5th
June 2003).
“Consumers
who wish to minimise their dietary pesticide exposure can do
so with confidence by buying organically grown food” (Baker
et al 2002).
Organophosphates
The most dangerous
chemicals used in farming such as organophosphates [pesticides]
have been linked with a range of conditions such as cancer,
decreasing male fertility, foetal abnormalities, chronic fatigue
syndrome in children and Parkinson’s disease. 8,9 Pesticide
residues have been ranked among the top three environmental
cancer risks by the American Government. 10
Pesticide residues
in food
In recent years,
UK Government research has consistently found pesticide residues
in a third of food, including residues of more than one chemical
in apples, baby food, bread, cereal bars, fresh salmon, lemons,
lettuces, peaches, nectarines, potatoes and strawberries. 11
Not all foodstuffs are checked; instead a small number of different
products is tested every 3 months and the results published
by the Pesticide Safety Directorate (PSD).
Residues of multiple
pesticides: the cocktail effect
After pressure from
NGOs [non-governmental organisations] such as the Soil Association,
the PSD has begun testing for multiple pesticide residues in
its samples because evidence suggests that when acting in combination,
harmful effects of pesticide residues may be increased. The
Government has recognised that “….ignoring the cocktail
effects during risk assessment will lead to significant under-estimations
of risk”.12
Combinations of low-level
insecticides, herbicides and nitrates have been shown to be
toxic at levels that individual chemicals are not.13 - 16 It
is clearly an enormous task to test all possible combinations
of the 400 permitted pesticides currently in use. It is clear
that not enough is known about how combinations of pesticides
affect our health, and the Government’s Committee on Toxicity
has expressed disquiet about the risks involved.17
Pesticides and cancer
Women with breast
cancer are five to nine times more likely to have pesticide
residues in their blood than those who do not.18 Previous studies
have shown that those with occupational exposure to pesticides
have higher rates of cancer.19 - 21 The apparent link between
hormone dependent cancers, such as those of the breast and prostate,
may be via endocrine disrupting chemicals [compounds that artificially
affect the hormone system] such as 2,4D and Atrazine (both herbicides,
now banned or about to be banned). The Royal Society [the UK’s
main scientific organisation] recommends that human exposure
to EDCs (especially during pregnancy) should be minimised on
grounds of prudence.63
Effects of pesticides
on children
Children may be particularly
susceptible to pesticide residues as they have a higher intake
of food and water per unit of body weight than adults and their
relatively immature organ systems may have limited ability to
detoxify these substances.22
In a study of children
aged 2 –4 living in Seattle, concentrations of pesticide
residues up to six times higher were found in children eating
conventionally farmed fruit and vegetables compared with those
eating organic food.23 Whilst the presence of pesticide residues
in children eating conventional food has been confirmed, the
full effect of such pesticides are unknown.
2) FOOD ADDITIVES
Food colourings and
additives can cause a range of health problems in adults and
children. For example, tartrazine (the yellow food colouring
E102) and other additives have been linked to allergic reactions,
headaches, asthma, growth retardation and hyperactivity in children.24
- 27
Although around 300
additives are permitted in conventional food only 30 are allowed
under Soil Association standards. Some additives found in organic
food are added for legal reasons including iron, thiamine (vitamin
B) and nicotinic acid (vitamin B3) in white flour, and various
vitamins and minerals in different types of baby foods. All
artificial colourings and artificial sweeteners are banned in
organic food.
Specific ingredients
and additives not allowed in organic food are monosodium glutamate,
aspartame, phosphoric acid and hydrogenated fats. In each case
their use has been banned because of evidence that they can
be damaging to health. For example, hydrogenated fats (also
known as trans fats) have been directly linked with increased
rates of heart disease, cancer and skin disease. 28,29,30,31
The FSA [Food Standards Agency] acknowledges that they have
no known nutritional benefits and increase the risk of coronary
heart disease. The FSA website advises that people should try
to cut down their consumption of hydrogenated fat. 32
3) GENETICALLY MODIFIED
ORGANISMS
Genetically modified
organisms are banned from organic food.
The potential health
effects of GM foods are unknown. Michael Meacher the former
Minister for the Environment recently stated that “We
have had no systematic clinical or biochemical trials of the
effects on human beings of eating GM food”.
A paper in Nutrition
and Health 33 supports Mr Meacher’s position. The authors
state that there have only been ten published studies of the
health effects of GM food and that the quality of some of these
was inadequate. Over half were done in collaboration with companies
(fully or partially), and these found no negative effects on
body organs. The others were done independently and looked more
closely at the effects on the gut lining; in several, evidence
of harmful effects were found which remain unexplained. 33
Similar effects on
the gut lining were found in an unpublished animal feeding study
on a GM tomato. In addition, a study by Newcastle University
sponsored by the FSA found that the transgenes [genetically
modified organisms] transfer into gut bacteria at detectable
levels after only one GM meal. The health effects of these transgenes
are unknown and until they have been properly tested people
are, in our opinion, wise to avoid eating GM food.
4) ESSENTIAL VITAMINS
AND MINERALS
UK and US government
statistics indicate that levels of trace minerals in fruit and
vegetables fell by up to 76% between 1940 and 1991. 34,35 In
contrast there is growing evidence that organic fruit and vegetables
generally contain more nutrients than non-organic food.
The Soil Association
conducted a systematic review of the evidence comparing the
vitamin and mineral content of organic and conventionally grown
food. It was found that, on average, organic food contains higher
levels of vitamin C and essential minerals such as calcium,
magnesium, iron and chromium. 36
An independent review
of the evidence found that organic crops had significantly higher
levels of all 21 nutrients analysed compared with conventional
produce including vitamin C (27% more), magnesium (29% more),
iron (21% more) and phosphorous (14% more). Organic spinach,
lettuce, cabbage and potatoes showed particularly high levels
of minerals. 37
5) ANTIOXIDANTS
A high antioxidant
intake has been shown to be associated with a reduced incidence
of coronary heart disease and some cancers. Such antioxidants
include certain vitamins (vitamin E and beta-carotene) and substances
known as phenolics. Researchers have recognised the growing
concern that levels of some phenolics may be lower than is optimal
for human health in conventionally grown foods. 38Phenolics
are generated by a plant when attacked by pests.
Generally, organic
crops are not protected by pesticides and research has shown
that organically produced fruit contains higher levels of phenolic
compounds than conventionally grown fruit. 38,39 Danish researchers
have found that organic crops contain 10% to 50% more antioxidants
than conventional crops. 40
6) ESSENTIAL FATTY
ACIDS
The essential fatty
acids (EFA), omega 3 and conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) play
an essential role in metabolism [chemical changes which take
place in our bodies to utilise food and eliminate waste materials]
and especially in the prevention of coronary heart disease and
high blood pressure 41,42,43. Omega 3s also reduce the risk
of neurological disorders including depression 44,45,46 and
ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder) in children
47,48,49,50, 51,52. Furthermore, CLA has been demonstrated to
help prevent cancer and degenerative changes in the walls of
the arteries 53,54 enhance growth promotion and reduce body
fat 54, 55, 56.
Forage based diets
[a diet based on fresh or dried food as opposed to processed
feed] form the basis of organic livestock production systems
and have the potential to decrease saturated fat concentrations
and to increase the concentrations of omega-3 57, 58 and CLA
59,50,61 in beef. Milk taken from animals fed on a forage-based
diet also display improved levels of EFAs, including CLA and
omega 3. 61, 62
7) ALLERGIES
In a study of Swedish
children, the prevalence of atopic disorders [allergies] from
two different groups of children was measured. The study compared
295 children aged 5 – 13 years from two anthroposophic
schools [schools with an alternative approach to education]
with 380 children from two neighbouring state schools. The anthroposophical
school children ate a predominantly organic diet, used antibiotics
restrictively, had few vaccinations and their diet usually contained
live lactobacilli [a friendly bacteria found in the upper intestinal
tract of humans and in some yoghurts and in unpasteurised milk].
It was found that the anthroposophic way of life is associated
with a lowered prevalence of atopy in children. 4
The reduced incidence
of atopic disorders is likely to be the result of a combination
of lifestyle differences between the two groups of children
so that the contribution of organic food consumption is unclear.
However, consumption of organic food is the single most common
factor unifying the anthroposophic children.
8) FERTILITY
A steady deterioration
in male reproductive health has been reported throughout Europe.
Sperm concentrations have declined and abnormalities in sperm
development have been recorded.
Danish research compared
the sperm density of members of an organic farming association
(OFA) with that of three different occupational groups and found
that that the former had significantly higher sperm counts 2.
This research was corroborated in 1996 when members of another
Danish OFA were compared with a control group of 797 healthy
men. It was found that “…sperm concentration was
higher among men eating organically produced food” 3.
“A biological
plausible hypothesis has suggested that man-made chemicals act
as endocrine disrupters (EDC) resulting in altered development
of the reproductive tract causing the observed effects”5.
A number of pesticides regularly used in conventional agriculture
are known to be EDCs. Therefore, if an individual’s diet
does not contain pesticide residues, it can be hypothesised
that the above abnormalities of sperm would be less likely.
9) POSITION OF THE
FOOD STANDARDS AGENCY AND THE GOVERNMENT
The Food Standards
Agency responded to the Soil Association’s report “Organic
farming, food quality and human health’ (2001) by stating
that:
On the basis of current
evidence, the Agency's assessment is that organic food is not
significantly different in terms of food safety and nutrition
from food produced conventionally. 1
The Government has
taken a more open-minded view. At a meeting between members
of the Government’s Organic Action Plan and the FSA, the
then Organic Farming Minister, Elliot Morley, suggested to the
FSA that:
"….while
the FSA is clear that all conventionally produced food is safe,
the FSA could also recognise that some consumers want less pesticide
residues, less use of veterinary medicines, no routine use of
antibiotics, and no use of GM ingredients, and that in all these
areas organic food delivers what the consumers want."
At that time, Sir
John Krebs the Chair of the FSA, was unwilling to change its
stance on organic food. However, in recent months Sir John has
endorsed one of the organic sector’s findings, namely
that organic food contains less pesticide residues.
“Organic food
contains fewer residues of pesticides used in conventional agriculture,
so buying organic is one way to reduce the chances that your
food contains these pesticides” (Sir John Krebs, Cheltenham
Science Festival debate, 5th June 2003).
Footnotes:
References
1) http://www.foodstandards.gov.uk/science/
sciencetopics/organicfood/
2) Abel A et al (1994)
High sperm density amongst members of organic farmers’
association, The Lancet, 343, p. 1498.
3) Jensen TK et al
(1996) Semen quality among members of organic food associations
in Zealand, Denmark, The Lancet, 347, p. 1844
4) Alm JS et al (1999)
Atopy in children of families with an anthroposophic lifestyle,
The Lancet, 353, p. 1485 – 1488.
5) Chia SE. (2000)
Endocrine disruptors and male reproductive function--a short
review. International Journal of Andrology, 23 Suppl 2:45-6.
6) Baker BP, Benbrook
CM, Groth E, and Benbrook KL (2002) Pesticide residues in conventional,
IPM-grown and organic foods: Insights from three U.S. data sets.
Food Additives and Contaminants, 19, (5), p. 427-446.
7) MAFF (1998) 'Orchards
and fruit stores in Great Britain 1996', Pesticide Usage Survey
Report 142, MAFF publications, London.
8) BMA (1992) The
BMA guide to pesticides, chemicals and health, Report of the
Board of Science and Education, British Medical Association.
9) Robbins C (1991)
Poisoned harvest: A consumer’s guide to pesticide use
and abuse, Victor Gollancz Ltd, p. 300 – 313.
10) Balch JF and
Balch PA, 1997, Prescriptions for nutritional healing, 2nd edition,
Avery publishers, USA p. 176-183.
11) Pesticides Residues
Committee (various years), Annual Report of the Pesticides Residues
Committee, Pesticide Safety Directorate, DEFRA.
12) www.foodstandards.gov.uk/
science/ouradvisors/toxicity/COTwg/wigramp/ Stakeholder
13) Porter et al
(1993) Groundwater pesticides: interactive effects of low concentrations
of carbamates aldicarb and methomyl and the triazine metribuzin
on thyroxine and somatrophin levels in white rats, Journal of
Toxicology and Environmental Health, (40) p. 15 – 34.
14) Boyd et al (1990)
Behavioural and neurochemical changes associated with chronic
exposure to low level concentrations of pesticide mixtures,
Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, (30) p. 209
– 221.
15) Porter et al
(1999) Endochrine immune and behavioural effects of aldicarb
(carbamate), atrazine (triazine) and nitrate (fertiliser) mixtures
at groundwater concentrations, Toxicology and Industrial health,
(15) p. 133 – 150.
16) Thiruchelvam
M et al (2000) The nigrostriatal dopaminergic system as a preferential
target of repeated exposures to combined paraquat and maneb:
implications for Parkinson’s Disease, Journal of Neuroscience,
20 (24) p. 2907 – 9214.
17) Committee on
Toxicity (2002) Committee on Toxicity of Chemicals in Food,
Consumer Products and the Environment: Risk assessment of mixtures
of pesticides and similar substances, Crown Copyright, September
2002.
18) Charlier G et
al (2003) Breast cancer and serum organochlorine residues, Occupational
and Environmental Medicine, 60 (5), p. 348 - 351
19) Schreinemachers
DM (2000) Cancer mortality in four Northern wheat producing
states, Environmental Health Perspectives, 108 (9), p. 873 –
881.
20) Alavanja MCR
et al (2003) Use of agricultural pesticides and prostate cancer
risks in the agricultural health study cohort, American Journal
of Epidemeology, 157 (9), p. 800 – 814.
21) Ohio G. (1999)
Endocrine disrupting chemicals and carcinogenicity Gan To Kagaku
Ryoho, 26 (3), p. 263-8. (Japanese)
22) Eskenazi B, Bradman
A and Castorina R, ‘Exposures of children to rganophosphate
pesticides and their potential adverse health effects’,
Environmental Health Perspectives, 107 (supp 3) p. 409 –
418.
23) Curl CL , RA
Fenske and K Elgethun (2003) Organophosphorus pesticide exposure
of urban and suburban pre-school children with organic and conventional
diets, Environmental Health Perspectives, 111 (3) p. 377 –
382.
24) Hanssen M and
Marsden J (1987) E for additives, 2nd edition, Harper Collins,
UK
25) Holford P (1998)
100% Health, Piatkus, London, p. 128 – 132.
26) Ward NI, Soulsbury
KA, Zettel VH, Colquhoun ID, Bunday S and Barnes B (1990) ‘The
influence of the chemical additive tartrazine on the zinc status
of hyperkinetic children. Double blind placebo-controlled study’,
Journal of Nutritional Medicine 1, p. 51 – 57.
27) Food Standards
Agency (2000) ‘Do food additives cause hyperactivity and
behaviour problems in a geographically defined population of
3 year old?’ MAFF/DEFRA project code FS3015.
28) EC Multicentre
Study on Antioxidants, 1997.
29) Willet W et al
(1993) ‘Intake of transfatty acids and risk of coronary
heart disease amongst women’, The Lancet 341 (8845), p.
581 – 585.
30) Triosi R et al
(1992) Trans-fatty acid intake in relation to serum lipid concentrations
in adult men, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, , 56,
p. 1010 – 1024.
31) Erasmus U (1999)
Fats that heal, fats that kill, 2nd edition, Alive Books, Canada.
32) http://www.foodstandards.gov.uk/healthiereating/asktheexpert/fatsoils/hydrogenatedfat
33) Pryme IF &
Lembcke R (2003) In vivo studies on possible health consequences
of genetically modified food and feed - with partifular regard
to ingredients consisting of genetically modified plant materials.
Nutrition and Health, 2003, Vol 17, p. 1-8
34) McCance &
Widdowson (1991) The composition of foods. MAFF and the Royal
Society of Chemistry.
35) Bergner P (1997)
The healing power of minerals, special nutrients and trace elements,
p. 312. Prima Publishing, Rocklin, CA.
36) Soil Association
(2001) Organic Farming, food quality and human health: a review
of the evidence.
37) Worthington V
(2001) Nutritional quality of organic versus conventional fruits,
vegetables, and grains. The Journal of Complimentary Medicine,
vol. 7, No. 2, p. 161 – 173.
38) Asami et al (2003)
Comparison of the Total Phenolic and Ascorbic Acid content of
freeze-dried and Air Dried Marionberry, Strawberry and Corn
Using Conventional, Organic, and Sustainable Agricultural Practices.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2003, 51, p. 1237
– 1241;
39) Carbonaro et
al M (2003) Modulation of Antioxidant Compounds in Organic vs
Conventional Fruit (Peach, Prunus persica L., and Pear, Pyrus
communis L.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2002,
50, p. 5458 – 5462).
40) Brandt K and
Molgaard JP (2001), ‘Organic Agriculture: Does it enhance
or reduce the nutritional value of food plants’, Journal
of Science in Food and Agriculture, 81, p. 924 - 931
41) Siscovick, D.
S., T. E. Raghunathan, et al. (1995). Dietary Intake and Cell
Membrane Levels of Long-Chain n-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
and the Risk of Primary Cardiac Arrest. Journal American Medical
Association, 274(17): p. 1363 - 1367)
42) Department of
Health (2000) National Service Framework for Coronary Heart
Disease. 43) Lichtenstein AH (2003) Dietary fat and cardiovascular
disease risk: quantity or quality? Journal of Womens Health
(Larchmt), 12(2), p. 109 - 14.
44) Stoll A L (2001)
The Omega-3 Connection: The Groundbreaking Anti-depression Diet
and Brain Program.
45) Haag M (2003)
Essential fatty acids and the brain. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry,
48, (3), p. 195-203.
46) Colin A, Reggers
J, Castronovo V, Ansseau M. (2003) Lipids, depression and suicide
Encephale 2003 Jan-Feb, 29(Pt 1): p. 49-58.
47) Richardson AJ,
Puri BK.(2002) A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled
study of the effects of supplementation with highly unsaturated
fatty acids on ADHD-related symptoms in children with specific
learning difficulties. Prog Neuropsychopharm Biol Psychiat,
2002, 26(2) p. 233 - 239.
48) Kidd PM (2000)
Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children:
rationale for its integrative management. Altern Med Rev. Oct;5(5):
p. 401.
49) Bruce, AW and
Oakland, TD (2002) Alternative Treatments for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity
Disorder: Does Evidence Support Their Use? Alternative Therapies
in Health and Medicine. January 2002.
50) Romm, A and Romm,
T. (2000) ADHD Alternatives: A Natural Approach to Treating
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Storey Books.
51) Stengler, Mark
and Stengler, Angela (2001) Your Vital Child. Rodale Press.
52) Weintraub, S.
(1997) Natural Treatments for ADD and Hyperactivity. Pleasant
Grove, Utah:Woodland Publishing.
53) Scimeca, J.A
et al (1994) Conjugated linoleic acid. A powerful anti-carcinogen
from animal fat sources." p. 1053. Cancer, 74 (3 suppl),
p. 1050-4.
54) Martin JC, Valeille
K (2002) Conjugated linoleic acids: all the same or to everyone
its own function? Reprod Nutr Dev, 42(6), 525 – 536.
55) Belury MA. (2002)
Dietary conjugated linoleic acid in health: physiological effects
and mechanisms of action. Annual Review of Nutrition, 22, 505
- 531
56) Banni, S. et
al (1999). Influence of dietary conjugated linoleic acid on
lipid metabolism in relation to its anticarcinogenic activity.
Chpt 23. in Advances in Conjugated Linoleic Acid Research. M.P.
Yurawecz, M.M. Mossoba, J.K.G. Kramer, M.W. Pariza, G.J. Nelson,
eds. Vol.1. AOCS press. Champaign. Illinois.
57) Warren, H, Scollan,
N.D, Hallett, K, Enser, M, Richardson, I, Nute, G and Wood,
J.D (2002) The effects of breed and diet on the lipid composition
and meat quality of bovine muscle. Proceedings of the 48th International
Congress of Meat Science and Technology, Rome.
58) French P et al
(2000) Fatty acid composition, including conjugated linoleic
acid, of intramuscular fat from steers offered grazed grass,
grass silage, or concentrate-based diets. Journal of Animal
Science, 78 (11), p. 2849 – 2855.
59) Dhiman, T. R.,
G. R. Anand, et al. (1999). "Conjugated linoleic acid content
of milk from cows fed different diets." Journal of Dairy
Science, 82(10), p. 2146 - 2156.
60) www.agrsci.dk/index_uk.shtml
61) Jahreis, G.,
J. Fritsche and H. Steinhart. (1997) Conjugated linoleic acid
in milk fat: High variation depending on production system.
Nutr. Res, 17, p. 1479 - 1484.
62) Bergamo P, Fedel
E, Iannibelli L, & Marzillo G (2003) Fat soluble vitamin
contents and fatty acid composition in organic and conventional
dairy products. Food Chemistry, 82, p. 625 – 631.
63) The Royal Society
(2000) Endocrine disrupting chemicals, June 2000 http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/
files/statfiles/document-111.pdf
Please see the Soil
Association website library, http://www.soilassociation.org/library,
for more information
|